A quick rule of thumb

Any pedagogy invoking chaos theory as a justification is probably nonsense, or partially nonsense.

It appears that descriptions of cognitive functions as being rules by chaos theory are, at present, merely speculative, and no empirical evidence exists to suggest that this is indeed the case.

No paper arguing for the application of chaos theory I’ve yet read mentions the three necessary conditions/ characteristics for chaos and none tackles the line between the deterministic aspect of mathematically modelled systems and the forms of relativism espoused.

Given that chaos theory seems to be a function of mathematical modelling, and is a mathematical theory, any application of it that doesn’t do the math can be ignored. The application of chaos theory is mathematical, it’s description and expression is mathematical. If the paper doesn’t show it’s work, or it’s work isn’t maths, we can ignore it.



This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s